Talk:Main Page
Contents
Additional Suggested Categories
- Fact
- History
- The Development of the Cthulhu Mythos
- History of the CoC RPG
- Media
- CoC as Pop Culture
- History
- Games
- Role-Playing Games
- The Call of Cthulhu (RPG)
- Rules Books
- Investigator's Companion
- Keeper's Compendium I
- etc.
- 1890's Setting
- 1920's Setting
- Cthulhu Classics
- Masks of Nyarlothotep
- etc.
- Modern Setting
- Delta Green
- etc.
- Rules Books
- GURPS Cthulhupunk
- The Call of Cthulhu (RPG)
- Role-Playing Games
Wiki.yog-sothoth.com
- Currently we re-direct wiki.yog-sothoth.com to www.yog-sothoth.com/wiki/
It's cleaner to simply keep and run the wiki at wiki.yog-sothoth.com Would suggest looking into it - allows access and usage to be tracked easier.
Fact vs. Fiction
- If we separate fact vs. fiction within the scope of each entry, we should be fine. To every factual entry, we can have a "So and So within the Cthulhu Mythos" section. This could easily work for Historic Locations/Figures, etc. Items that have both fact and fiction entries, such as Aleister Crowley - he appears in Golden Dawn (Adventure) IIRC - can be listed under both Category:Historical Occultists and Category:Tenebrous Persons --Squashua 11:13, 2 February 2006 (EST)
Basic Wiki Rules
- Need to establish basic wiki rules of use/conduct. See Tutorial:Cthulhuwiki Rules and add to it. --Squashua 13:48, 19 January 2006 (EST)
The Date/Year Pages
A lot of information has been extracted from the original Wikipedia. Clean out these pages, outside-linking to the relevant Wikipedia entry from a centralized era page, and keep internal links as needed. All years should incorporate both Fact and Mythos/Fiction elements, but Fiction must be highlighted. There is a {{mythos|text}} template for this.
CoC:Supplements or Not ?
Need to determine if we should sub-categorize the supplements found on Category:CoC:Supplements. Input needed. Rules Books, 1890's Setting, 1920's Setting, Modern Setting, etc. --Squashua 18:15, 3 February 2006 (EST)
