Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(→Fact vs. Fiction) |
(→Wikipedia vs CthulhuWiki) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Wikipedia vs CthulhuWiki == | == Wikipedia vs CthulhuWiki == | ||
| − | *A lot of information has been extracted from the original Wikipedia. I | + | *A lot of information has been extracted from the original Wikipedia. If I'm not mistaken, this is primarily a CoC RPG resource. |
| + | |||
| + | Under the impression that this wiki is more for gaming/keeper/player purposes - that's where we can help guide it. If combining both factual and fiction information, there is a <nowiki>{{mythos|text}}</nowiki> template for this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I recommend that we: | ||
| + | # Revise any page stolen from Wikipedia | ||
| + | # Leave only info relevant to this wiki | ||
| + | # Emphasize a link BACK to the Wikipedia entry. | ||
== Fact vs. Fiction == | == Fact vs. Fiction == | ||
Revision as of 23:12, 13 February 2006
Contents
Wiki.yog-sothoth.com
- Currently we re-direct wiki.yog-sothoth.com to www.yog-sothoth.com/wiki/ It's cleaner to simply keep and run the wiki at wiki.yog-sothoth.com . Would suggest looking into it - allows access and usage to be tracked easier.
Basic Wiki Rules
- Need to establish basic wiki rules of use/conduct. See Tutorial:Cthulhuwiki Rules and add to it. --Squashua 13:48, 19 January 2006 (EST)
Wikipedia vs CthulhuWiki
- A lot of information has been extracted from the original Wikipedia. If I'm not mistaken, this is primarily a CoC RPG resource.
Under the impression that this wiki is more for gaming/keeper/player purposes - that's where we can help guide it. If combining both factual and fiction information, there is a {{mythos|text}} template for this.
I recommend that we:
- Revise any page stolen from Wikipedia
- Leave only info relevant to this wiki
- Emphasize a link BACK to the Wikipedia entry.
Fact vs. Fiction
- If we separate fact vs. fiction within the scope of each entry, we should be fine. To every factual entry, we can have a "So and So within the Cthulhu Mythos" section. This could easily work for Historic Locations/Figures, etc. Items that have both fact and fiction entries, such as Aleister Crowley - he appears in Golden Dawn (Adventure) IIRC - can be listed under both Category:Historical Occultists and Category:Mythos:Characters --Squashua 11:13, 2 February 2006 (EST)
CoC:Supplements or Not ?
- Need to determine if we should sub-categorize the supplements found on Category:CoC:Supplements. Input needed. Rules Books, 1890's Setting, 1920's Setting, Modern Setting, etc. --Squashua 18:15, 3 February 2006 (EST)
- Some of the books would be tough to catagorize in only 1 catagory. Taint of Madness, for example. --phobia @ the Shoggoth Network 01:43, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- Taint of Madness is the insanities sourcebook, right? It would go under Sourcebooks, just like the Cairo and Bermuda Triangle Sourcebooks. --Squashua 08:18, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- it covers historical and game info for all 3 eras, and includes a scenario for each. Where would you put it?
- Sourcebook. Scenarios are listed individually, so each gets listed in the Scenario's section; and the portion on insanities would be listed as an Article, and all would be linked to within the Sourcebook's page. Because there is SO MUCH re-use/reprinting in Chaosium (I've seen the same article in the CoC Main Book, an old Campaign Book AND in a Keeper's Compendium), it makes sense to list the portions individually and leave the details regarding such out of the books themselves. On a related subject, Scenarios should probably be sub-divided based on era/setting. --Squashua 23:07, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- Fair enough. You've got my vote to catagorize them in this manner. *How are monograph scenarios to be catagorized? Are we treating these as official scenarios, fan material, or something else? How about scenarios in other publications? I think it would be simplest to catagorize them all in the same Scenarios catagory and just have the source listed as part of the overall page. --phobia @ the Shoggoth Network 11:14, 10 February 2006 (EST)
- All Scenarios are to be categorized as CoC:Scenarios, whether published, availability, etc. All articles ("Lovecraftian Supers" for example, or "The Keeper's List of Lists") are CoC:Articles. Each will link to whichever book/etc. published it. Some scenarios and articles have been published multiple times in different places. --Squashua 13:12, 10 February 2006 (EST)
- it covers historical and game info for all 3 eras, and includes a scenario for each. Where would you put it?
- Taint of Madness is the insanities sourcebook, right? It would go under Sourcebooks, just like the Cairo and Bermuda Triangle Sourcebooks. --Squashua 08:18, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- Some of the books would be tough to catagorize in only 1 catagory. Taint of Madness, for example. --phobia @ the Shoggoth Network 01:43, 4 February 2006 (EST)
Additional Suggested Categories
- Fact
- History
- The Development of the Cthulhu Mythos
- History of the CoC RPG
- Media
- CoC as Pop Culture
- History
- Games
- Role-Playing Games
- The Call of Cthulhu (RPG)
- Rules Books
- Investigator's Companion
- Keeper's Compendium I
- etc.
- 1890's Setting
- 1920's Setting
- Cthulhu Classics
- Masks of Nyarlothotep
- etc.
- Modern Setting
- Delta Green
- etc.
- Rules Books
- GURPS Cthulhupunk
- The Call of Cthulhu (RPG)
- Role-Playing Games