Difference between revisions of "Sunshine (2007 film)"

From [YSDC] Into The Deep
Jump to: navigation, search
(Page created.)
 
(Reviews)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
<!--A list of reviews for the work, along with the review's rating (for example, "4/5 Stars") * Author_andor_Location, ([URL link]) - RATING -->
 
<!--A list of reviews for the work, along with the review's rating (for example, "4/5 Stars") * Author_andor_Location, ([URL link]) - RATING -->
 
Review Links:
 
Review Links:
* (review needed)
+
* Robert Brodmerkel at The Horror Review ([http://www.horrorreview.com/sunshine/ link]) - "Early in the film one character jokingly refers to alien body count movies but, even when ''Sunshine'' becomes a pure genre flick, it never lapses into routine. Obscuring the central menace visually and maintaining a degree of ambiguity about whether the events of the final reels are even really happening, Boyle stages a denouement that plays like the film ''Event Horizon'' should have been."
 
+
* Roger Ebert at Roger Ebertdotcom (3 Stars)  ([http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/sunshine-2007 link]) - "The drummed-up suspense at the end is not essential, since Boyle and Garland seem more interested in the metaphysics of the voyage... ...science-fiction fans will like it, and also brainiacs, and those who sometimes look at the sky and think, man, there's a lot going on up there, and we can't even define precisely what a soliton is."
 +
* Richard Scheib at the Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film Review (3/5 Stars) ([http://moria.co.nz/sciencefiction/sunshine-2007.htm link]) - "...Boyle and Garland do an impressive job at setting Sunshine up as a hard science-fiction film, the results end up disappointing. ... The most disappointing part of Sunshine is the direction the plot takes in the last third. Here Alex Garland veers off from a promising hard science plot into the tired and hackneyed. ...  The whole Pinbacker element – where...the inability on Alex Garland’s part to tell us what is going on during these sections is sloppy writing."
  
 
==Synopsis==
 
==Synopsis==
Line 52: Line 53:
 
===Associated Mythos Elements===
 
===Associated Mythos Elements===
 
* TO DO
 
* TO DO
 +
* setting:  [[Cthulhu Icarus]]
  
  

Latest revision as of 10:23, 11 March 2017

Promotional image for Sunshine (2007 film)...

Summary

"50 years in the future, Earth's Sun is dying. If the Sun dies, so do we." A team of international astronauts are sent on a dangerous mission to reignite the dying Sun with a nuclear fission bomb in 2057.

Details

  • Release Date: 2007
  • Country/Language: US/US, English
  • Genres/Technical: Science Fiction, Horror, Thriller
  • Runtime: 1 hr 47 min
  • Starring: Cillian Murphy, Rose Byrne, Chris Evans
  • Director: Danny Boyle
  • Writer: Alex Garland
  • Producer/Production Co: DNA Films, Ingenious Film Partners, Moving Picture Company (MPC)
  • View Trailer: (link)

Ratings

MPAA Ratings

  • Rated: R (Violence, Profanity)

Tentacle Ratings

A rough measure of how "Lovecraftian" the work is:

  • S____ (One Tentacle: Debateably Lovecraftian; has almost no direct connection to Lovecraft's work)

Similar to Event Horizon (1997 film) and Alien (1979 franchise), this is a sort of Gothic haunted-house-in-space story; in this case, the main plot is said to be suspiciously similar to Clark Ashton Smith's short story "Phoenix".

Note: This rating is not intended as a measure of quality, merely of how closely related to Lovecraftian "Weird" fiction the work is.

Reviews

Review Links:

  • Robert Brodmerkel at The Horror Review (link) - "Early in the film one character jokingly refers to alien body count movies but, even when Sunshine becomes a pure genre flick, it never lapses into routine. Obscuring the central menace visually and maintaining a degree of ambiguity about whether the events of the final reels are even really happening, Boyle stages a denouement that plays like the film Event Horizon should have been."
  • Roger Ebert at Roger Ebertdotcom (3 Stars) (link) - "The drummed-up suspense at the end is not essential, since Boyle and Garland seem more interested in the metaphysics of the voyage... ...science-fiction fans will like it, and also brainiacs, and those who sometimes look at the sky and think, man, there's a lot going on up there, and we can't even define precisely what a soliton is."
  • Richard Scheib at the Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film Review (3/5 Stars) (link) - "...Boyle and Garland do an impressive job at setting Sunshine up as a hard science-fiction film, the results end up disappointing. ... The most disappointing part of Sunshine is the direction the plot takes in the last third. Here Alex Garland veers off from a promising hard science plot into the tired and hackneyed. ... The whole Pinbacker element – where...the inability on Alex Garland’s part to tell us what is going on during these sections is sloppy writing."

Synopsis

 Spoiler Section (Highlight to Read)

In the not-too-distant future, Earth's dying sun spells the end for humanity. In a last-ditch effort to save the planet, a crew of eight men and women ventures into space with a device that could revive the star. However, an accident, a grave mistake and a distress beacon from a long-lost spaceship throw the crew and its desperate mission into a tailspin.


Notes

Comments, Trivia, Dedication

Associated Mythos Elements


Keeper Notes